Churning Lawyers Part III

The intent is to spare the reader the task of reading through the entire newspaper article while clarifying in the most absolute of terms the meaning and actions of CHURNING LAWYERS, viz.:

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Thursday, March 14, 2019
……………………………………………………….
Headline:
GOP to
intervene
in suit on
abortion

………………………………………………………..
Subheading:
Lawmakers don’t trust
AG Kaul to defend laws
………………………………………………………..
Byline:
Patrick Marley
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
USA TODAY NETWORK – WISCONSIN
…………………………………………………………
Dispatch (Dateline):
MADISON – Republican lawmakers
are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit
brought by Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin
because they don’t trust Attorney
General Josh Kaul to defend the
state’s abortion laws.
The Democratic attorney general has
filed paperwork in the case saying he
intends to represent the state but hasn’t
spelled out what legal position he will
take.
The move is the latest example of
state officials from both parties using
taxpayer money to hire private attorneys
in legal fights over state laws.

Cont’d. . .
…………………………………………………….
The sentence in focus:
…………………………………………………….
The move is the latest example of
state officials from both parties using
taxpayer money to hire private attorneys
in legal fights over state laws.
………………………………………………………
The move is the latest example of
state officials from both parties using
taxpayer money to hire private attorneys
in legal fights over state laws.
……………………………………………………..
The move is the latest example of
state officials from both parties using
taxpayer money to hire private attorneys
in legal fights over state laws.
…………………………………………………….
The move is the latest example of
state officials from both parties using
taxpayer money to hire private attorneys
in legal fights over state laws.

……………………………………………………..

Sometimes the media slips up and hits upon the actual truth of things. These lawyers charge sometimes hundreds of dollars an hour (on the taxpayer’s dime) to rehash and revisit the same issues over and over again. As a taxpayer you should be outraged. It is safe to assume that some of that money circles back into the politician’s reelection campaign coffers.

About The Twentieth Man

Age 68
This entry was posted in Capitalism, Churning Lawyers, Economics, Expository Writing, Government, Justice, Mass Media, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.